Welcome to the AlienScientist Homepage
Exploring the Greatest Scientific Controversies of the 20-21st Century
The goal of Alienscientist.com" is to help humanity make the transition to a Type 1 Civilization (Kardashev Scale) mainly through the implementation of new technologies. (with a focus on Energy, Transportation, Communication, and Space Technologies)
Scientific Controversy and The Search for Truth
I am on a search for the truth, and science is my tool I use to find it. I am well known for tackling highly controversial issues and technologies, while drawing attention to how scientists or other people with invested business interests might act in a manner that impedes global scientific progress in cases where buying out or suppressing certain technologies or other markets when it protects or furthers their business interests. Bias in scientific studies is a serious problem in today's caplitalist society. We have Medical Scientists picking methods of data analysis that appear to give them the "better" results. We know Scientific journals prefer to publish experiments that have rather positive than negative results. This causes a bias on what scientists choose as objects of study and how they design their experiments. We have the Government suppressing medical studies on Marijuana because the studies gave results which conflicted with the perception of the drug that they wanted the public to have. We have the National Institute of Standards and Technology claiming that for the first time in history 3 unique fire-induced building collapse anomalies all took place on the same day, even though a similar event has never happened in 100 years of consturction/fire history! What does all this say about the current effects of Politics on Science? When the biggest paying scientific industries are the corporations, and there is so much cross-over between the interests of the corporation or establishment and the interests of the scientists performing the experiments, especially when their results or findings might greatly conflict with the establishment/corporation's goals.
I cover topics most scientists won't touch
Warning: These subjects will destroy your career if you get involved in them! This information is likely to change your world view drastically, including the way you view people, politics, world events, human history, etc. There is a reason they don't teach this kind of information in schools or talk about it on TV. Because this is information that could change the world, and that makes it scary to some people.
News and Current Events
Dying Senior Scientist Boyd Bushman makes incredible Death Bed Confession
November 2, 2014
Boyd Bushman claims this information was fed to him through sources deep inside Area 51, but who exactly were these "Sources"? and why does so much of this "New Information" look like the same old disinformation about UFOs and Aliens inside Area 51 we've been hearing about for years?
Alien: Fake or Real?
Rumors about Aliens working inside Area 51 have been common since the early days after World War 2, when Military Intelligence (or Counter-Intelligence) began spreading UFO and Alien stories to confuse and discredit locals who had accidentally witnessed the test flights of experimental top secret aircraft being built, flown, and tested at Area 51. The rumors proved effective at distracting the public and distorting any information they might provide to foreign intelligence agencies or other members of the public.
So... there are lots of good reasons to be skeptical about the claims being made about aliens in this interview as well as the sources of that information. We'll start with the photographs Boyd Bushman provides which he claims are pictures of a real alien being.
These photographs originally surfaced in 2009, when John Hutchison posted a video capture of the photoraphs to his YouTube Channel. John gives hints about his source for the information in this video, but does not name Boyd Bushman by name... Watch the video here:
Back in 2009, Richard Heene told me that he was actually the one who had first acquired these photographs from Boyd Bushman during an interview that Heene filmed with Boyd Bushman back in 2007-08. Richard Heene told me that he had provided these photographs to John Hutchison in an email, telling him not to share them with anyone. Heene says that Hutchison ignored Boyd Bushman's request, and immediately posted this above video to his YouTube Channel.
We are still unsure who first provided these photographs to Boyd Bushman telling him they were photos of a real alien being inside Area 51... But subsequent investigations have determined that the alien in the photographs is actually a doll sold by KMart stores ( item# 301330309572 )... Here are some pictures and videos of the doll:
The following video was posted on Nov 8, 2008 by YouTube user JonnOfMars (*Not John Hutchison) several months before I first heard the story from Richard Heene aroumd April or May 2009... It's likely that more than one of these dolls was produced and exists out there, and that whoever first provided these fake photographs to Boyd Bushman probably used a similar doll to stage the photos.
So it's a bit disappointing that the most crucial piece of evidence provided by the late Boyd Bushman's in his entire death bed confession is such an obvious fraud... As a scientist, I have been likewise disappointed with the quality of information, data, and evidence that Boyd Bushman has provided over the years. I really expected more from a senior scientist at Lockheed Martin who claims he had high level inside sources feeding him information. In my personal opinion, these "Sources" were either hoaxers or disinformation agents.
Let's take a comprehensive look at all of Boyd Bushman's "disclosures" regarding advanced propulsion or "Anti-Gravity" technologies...
Magnet Drop Gravitation Experiment: Anti-Magnetic Energy
In the following interview with David Sereda from 2003, Boyd Bushman claims that if you take two magnets and lock them together with opposing magnetic poles (anti-aligned), that the opposing magnetic forces affect the object's gravity such that the object will fall slower than if the poles were aligned.
In the interview Bushman even provides paperwork of 500 drop test experiments conducted from a height of 59 feet at a location in (White Settlement?) Texas on December 12, 1995. The document is not very clear in the video, but the words "ANTI-GRAVITY" are visible in the top left corner as well as the words "AT LMTAS" (aka AT Lokheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems) where Boyd claims the experiments were conducted.
Since real science isn't concerned with the details or results of these tests by Lockheed Martin, and only cares whether these results are replicable or not... I'd like to encourage everyone to try this experiment themselves and post their own results and data! I will be conducting and posting video of my own replication experiments shortly...
In 2009 William Alek conducted a magnet drop experiment where he claimed to have positively replicated Boyd's finding, Although he received criticism for conducting only one test, and releasing the objects by hand rather than with a trap door mechanism. All in all, I agree that much more thorough testing needs to be done to eliminate all sources of error from the expirment, and make sure that no one is fooling themselves.
In addition future experiments should try to measure the magnitude of opposing magnetic forces within the object, and compare that to the reduction in the natural acceleration of gravity, to find a relation between the two and thereby allow us to figure out the forces required to negate gravity altogether. (If indeed this even works at all...)
Boyd Bushman endorses the Hutchison Effect
This is another clip from Boyd's 2003 interview with David Sereda, where he endorses John Hutchison's claims of Anti-Gravity, claiming the effects are derived from high voltage electrostatics.
As a scientist, I am not persuaded by any such claims until I can reproduce them myself in my own laboratory under a similarly prescribed set of conditions. While I have seen first hand the effects of high-voltage electrostatics on light weight object such as "lifters", and done some of my own research into the Biefeld-Brown Effect, I have not seen evidence that the effect is strong enough to lift heavy steel cannon balls like the object shown in the Hutchison video. In my opinion this effect can be much more easily generated by affixing a camera to a box with a cannon ball inside of it, and then dropping the box down an elevator shaft, so it gives the appearance of the ball becoming weightless inside. The same would also work quite effectively for the milk shake / ice cream as well, giving the illusion of anti-gravity.
In the past I have exposed some of the serious problems with John Hutchison's various scientific claims, his lack of technical knowledge and explanations, as well as the complete inability of anyone else besides him to replicate any of his experiments in a controlled scientific setting. Until precise data and information is provided on exactly how to replicate these effects, and until those replications are successfully conducted, I will have to conclude that this is just another hoax that Boyd Bushman fell for hook, line, and sinker! (Just like that KMart Alien... XD)
Boyd Bushman endorses Bob Lazar
In another clip from Boyd's 2003 interview with David Sereda, he pawns off the stoy of Bob Lazar as a legitimate source for information regarding Area 51 and Antigravity Technology, claiming that the Bob Lazar tapes are as "far as I can talk"...
Having done my own extensive investigation into Bob Lazar and his scientific claims, and found no evidence for a "Stable isotope of Element 115" never mind one that has Anti-Gravity and trans-mutation effects as Bob Lazar has claimed in the recorded interviews he gave between 1989 and 1993... I've pretty much proved beyond any reasonable doubt that Bob Lazar is very definitely NOT who he says he was, that he did not actually attend CalTech or MIT, is not a real physicist, and basically just knows enough about science in order to baffle uneducated people with technical sounding bullshit.
Conclusions on Boyd Bushman's "Disclosures" and Death-Bed Confession
Judging by the content and validity of the data that Boyd Bushman has provided us over the years regarding Area 51, and Anti-Gravity technology, It's evident that Boyd's Sources were invididuals within the UFO / Alien / Conspiracy community, and not actual aerospace employees, high ranking scientists, or other insiders from Area 51 / Lockheed Skunkworks...
Over the years Boyd Bushman endorsed a variety of publicly available information regarding Anti-Gravity Technology, much of which remains unauthenticated or has otherwise been proven false.
Whoever provided Boyd Bushman with alleged photographic evidence of UFOs, Anti-Gravity craft, and Alien Beings inside of Area 51, obviously used pictures of an Alien doll purchased at KMart ( item# 301330309572 ), thereby drawing into question the validity of all the other photographs provided to Boyd Bushman through this same source of information. This anonymous source was most likely a con artist conducting a hoax at the expense of the late Boyd Bushman.
The fact that Boyd Bushman fell for this obvious fake KMart alien hoax (as well as so many other apparent frauds) draws strong skepticism on the legitimacy of his other "Sources" as well as the "Information" they have provided...
Any other claims, data, or other information that I may have missed or that you'd like me to address please contact me through my AlienScientist facebook page
2014 MIT Cold Fusion IAP
Feb 1, 2014
2014 MIT Cold Fusion IAP (All Lectures)
Monday January 27 Day 1 FULL Lecture (Introduction to Cold Fusion Science and Current Research, Superwaves and Phonon Modes, Laser Assisted Cold Fusion, Palladium Deuteride Loading parameters, Failures to replicate Pons and Fleishman, and discussion of Skepticism in Cold Fusion) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7Kg_Yp0ct8
Tuesday, January 28 Day 2 FULL lecture (Loading Parameters @24:49 Volmer-Taffel Regime, equations for Palladium Loading Models, Palladium Deuteride, superwaves and lattice interactions)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_PZh79zliI
Wednesday, January 29 Day 3 FULL lecture (Inavertant Codeposition, Helium 4 Production, Zirconium Oxide Helium Dissipation) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFmzKVkgFtM
Thursday, January 30 Day 4 FULL lecture (Phonon Modes and Lattice Vibrations, Theories on Phonons, and Killing Models, Spin-Boson Model, Karabut Experiment with Collimated X-Ray Emissions)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkPxOhjNlgM
Friday, January 31 Day 5 FULL lecture (Theories, Models, and more failed attempts at understand LENR Effects, Excess heat in NiH systems, Fukai Structure, Pantilli Experiment, more theory)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Al7NMQLvATo
Dr. Mitchell Swartz says he originally got into Cold Fusion research at MIT in order to debunk it. Now after years of research he is teaching a course at MIT on Cold Fusion experiments, methods, and results, and works alongside Dr. Hagelstein who is the theoretical side of the team.
Scholarly Papers by Mitchell Swartz on Electrochemical Loading
"Quasi-One-Dimensional Model of electrochemical loading of isotopic fuel into a metal" - Mitchell Swartz
"Codeposition of Palladium and Deuterium" - Mitchell Swartz (Right click and select "Save Target As")
Thank You to everyone who helped pay for my travel, food, and time expenses to film, edit, and produce these lectures! I was able to pay my parking ticket and travel expenses with that money. Please stay tuned for the MIT Colloqium coming up March 20, 2014!
Some Key points on Cold Fusion from the IAP Course:
1. The MIT and CalTech Cold Fusion replications did NOT get their loading high enough which is why they did not see excess heat results in their replication experiments which unfairly destroyed Cold Fusion's scientific reputation.
2. Deuterium Loading levels and the metalurgy of the Palladium Cathodes have a lot to do with the stability of the phonon modes which are believed to harbor the reaction. The research that has been done at MIT over the past decade or so indicates that the Cold fusion Nuclear Reactions take place on the surafe of the cathodes and can be stimulated using lasers and infra-red radiant heaters. There are a variety of the factors that have been identified which both increase and kill the Cold Fusion reaction, these are well documented but not well understood.
3. There are lots of refined techniques in preparing the Cathodes so they will reach the proper loading and acitvation levels withot cracking, oxidizing, or deteriorating, which have now been mastered and are being used to develoop nanomaterial dry cold fusion cells which are pre-loaded with Deuterium that has been prepared in such a way that it minimized Deuterium loss prevents leeching, and maintains loading of the metal over time through proprietary NANOR technology. (This is Mitchell Swartz's PHUSOR and NANOR technologies) Mastering the Volmer-Taffel Regime and using pelletized palladium suspended in Zirconium Oxide like chocolate chips inside cookie dough.
4. There are currently no good models which account for the phenomena being described and the best Model Hagelstein has come up with requires the 24Mev gammas expected from typical D+D->He4 Fusion Reactions to be divided up 109 times and dispersed through Phonon modes. He has run into a lot of problems trying to fit the Cold Fusion data to a working model or theory that is consistent with Nuclear Physics and Condensed Matter Physics.
See my Cold Fusion Page for more information and details.
Cold Fusion IAP Course at MIT
February 18, 2013
Cold Fusion IAP Lectures at MIT, now up on youtube:Dr. Mitchell Swartz Jan 28-29, 2013
Dr. Peter Hagelstein Jan 22-25, 2013
Last year I attended a 2 week IAP course on cold fusion at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology put on by Dr. Peter Hagelstein, and Dr. Mitchell Swartz, which I recorded and have posted to YouTube on the ColdFusionNow Channel. I encourage my viewers to watch these lectures and forward them to any interested parties as they present a very thorough and technically detailed overview of Cold Fusion Experiments, Theory, and technology. If you want the scientific and technical details, watch the lectures. There is a wealth of potent information in them. All I can tell you is that after having sat through these lectures myself and viewed them first hand, I now fully understand the potential and the reality of this breakthrough energy technology. In these lectures you will learn exactly what is required for making cold fusion work, and exactly what was wrong with the experiments where it didnít work. You will learn the best calorimentry methods for measuring excess heat and you will learn about experiments showing a direct correlation between excess heat and the production of Helium 4. In the description below this video I am going to link you to research papers detailing the exact requirements and conditions under which Cold Fusion works, and how to get it to work reliably and consistently. This technology has come a long way, and itís now ready to take the next step out of the laboratory and into the power plants of the future, a future where clean, sustainable, cold fusion energy will be free for all mankind.
But unfortunately the process of bringing this technology to the attention of those who can actually make a difference poses an enormous challenge. Just as the Cardinals refused to look through Galileoís telescope because it conflicted with the dogma of the time, the mainstream scientific community experiences similar pressure from the current establishment which persuades them to deny and reject the experimental evidence for cold fusion. But more importantly, as I mentioned before, is the issue of securing funding for further research into cold fusion when there is no way to patent and protect your intellectual property, meaning that the only way cold fusion research will ever get funding is if someone decides to fund it solely for the future benefit of our species, or in the interests of pure science. So I guess itís up to us to find these people and bring this information to their attention. Since itís unlikely we will have much luck altering the dogmatic beliefs of mainstream science, or reversing their conclusion about this issue. I think our best bet is to reach out to the people who have both the financial backing, and the interest in saving the planet. We must find a way to convince the philanthropists out there to invest in the future of humanity, to fund research into a clean energy technology that has the potential to turn the worldís oceans into bottomless fuel tanks, to help us convert our economy from one that is powered on pollution, to one that is powered on water and produces purified water in the process.
These MIT scientists have done a lot of work already to perform the research, refine the experiments, and document the specific scientific details for making cold fusion work reliably and consistently. Letís help them get funding to continue their research, and save us all from the looming energy crisis and pending economic collapse at the end of the age of oil. I encourage you to share these lectures and information far and wide, share the scientific papers Thereís more than enough hoaxers and con artists selling the promise of free energy. But this one, I can assure you, is real.
The Cold Fusion Revolution has begun, I encourage you all to learn more about this technology and how it can help us solve some of the biggest problems on the planet, and create a sustainable free energy future for all mankind.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz's 1995 paper showing the specific conditions under which the Cold Fusion reaction will occurs - He personally told me that this was a key paper.
Update: August 22, 2012
I am working to expand the scope and content of my website with a variety of new materials. I have added a section on intelligence which will include a history of intelligence agencies and operations, and information on methods and other techniques that are used for surveillance spying and general intelligence operations. I will also be adding a section to more specifically deal with all the various issues related to Extraterrestrials such as, ET Contact, Disclosure, Communication Analog, Contact Protocols, etc. Finally I have decided to add a section for debunking.
In my search for the truth I have come accross way too much "bunk" (for lack of a better word) out there, and finally I can't sit by and do nothing while people are mislead by hoaxers and cover-up artists. I have decided to make a section of my website specifically for exposing falsehoods, charlatans, liars, hoaxers, and the like. I expect this will upset some people (it already has), which is why I have a forum and an email address (email@example.com) for you to vent your frustrations and hopefully show me something I missed or got wrong.
One more thing... all my debunking is based on science NOT Character Assassination!
If you see anyone attempting to "debunk" someone using character assassination methods, you should automatically see this as a direct signal that they have absolutely no valid argument whatsoever. If they had one, they would present it front and center (like I do) and not even need to use character assassination methods to kill the messenger and ignore the message. This is not called debunking, this is called character assassination. Recognize it and learn to call people out on it!
The Science of Truth
On the Essence of Truth
By Martin Heidegger.
Fact vs. Opinion
The difference between fact and opinion is something that most of us learn in Elementary School. At the HS/college level these concepts of fact and opinion are abstracted to the notions of objectivity (fact) and subjectivity (opinion). Opinions can even be abstracted further into Ideologies, as all individuals hold a system of different opinions and knowledge about different types of subject matter. Popular ideologies such as religion are often used to manipulate as well as communicate with people through an understanding of the beliefs and opinions of these groups. Ideological Disinformation is an exploit of the weaknesses of opinionated thinkers. Scientific thinking is against our human nature, and as scientists or skeptical inquirers we must train ourselves to throw away all our appeals to opinions and beliefs, and trust only what can be proven fact by experiment, or evidence.
If you haven't read through the Wikipedia article on Logical Fallacies yet, please take the time and do so.
The main thing logical fallacies teach us is that the only valid arguments are those that use appeal to evidence, or appeal to nature, or experiment.
The Scientific Method
According to Wikipedia:
The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. The Oxford English Dictionary says that scientific method is: "a method or procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."
If the Wright Brothers had listenend to the skeptics, they would have never built the world's first airplane!
It is healthy to have a hunch, and I always recommend following your gut instinct. Albert Einstein himself said "Imagination is more important than knowledge", and it perfectly acceptable and healthy to let your mind wander freely. However, when it come to evaluating fact from fiction, I must agree it is always better to be skeptical, than it is to just believe in things. The skeptical approach is a safer approach: assume it's total BS until you can prove it otherwise. But that doesn't mean reject everything outright. Keep an open mind to the possibilities, and always look at both sides and try to keep your judgements fair and balanced.
Skepticism or scepticism (American/British spelling differences) is generally any questioning attitude towards knowledge, facts, or opinions/beliefs stated as facts, or doubt regarding claims that are taken for granted elsewhere.
Philosophical skepticism is an overall approach that requires all information to be well supported by evidence. Classical philosophical skepticism derives from the 'Skeptikoi', a school who "asserted nothing".
Precision over Ego
Admit when you are wrong! Be thrilled by it, actively seek to disprove everything you think you know, and be glad when someone can show you that you are wrong.
Human beings have a natural tendency to attach their beliefs to their own ego. They correlate their worldhood and knowledge with their own personal identity. An attack on their ideas, becomes an attack against them.
I have often been wrong many times in my life about many different things. This is why I tell people to "do your own research" because, I don't always get everything right. I am also never afraid to admit to my mistakes, in fact I love when my audience points them out. I learn as much from you guys as you learn from me.
I call this "precision over ego" because it is more important to have precise information, than it is to protect your own ego. Being afraid to admit your mistakes because you fear how others will perceive you is no way to find the real truth.
It's ok to say "I don't know"! In fact, that is preferable to making up something or pretending like you know. Throw away the ego, don't be afraid to admit when you are wrong.
Special Thanks to our sponsor:
AlienScientist.com is made possible thanks to support from viewers like you! A very special thanks to fibonaccisys.com which provides us with webhosting and top notch technical support. If you can't support us with donations, please visit our sponsor's website and click around on some of their ads. Thanks!
Contribute to something extraordinary!